{"id":119279,"date":"2026-04-27T15:34:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-27T19:34:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/?p=119279"},"modified":"2026-04-27T16:28:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-27T20:28:19","slug":"aha-files-amicus-brief-in-lawsuit-defending-public-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/news\/aha-files-amicus-brief-in-lawsuit-defending-public-history\/","title":{"rendered":"AHA Files Amicus Brief in Lawsuit Defending Public History"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The American Historical Association has filed an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/NPS-brief-filed.pdf\">amicus curiae brief<\/a> in support of the City of Philadelphia\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courtlistener.com\/docket\/72291266\/city-of-philadelphia-v-doi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lawsuit<\/a> challenging the removal of the Freedom and Slavery Exhibit at Independence National Historical Park. Our brief provides historical and professional context for the case, which argues that the National Park Service\u2019s actions undermine the historical integrity of the site.<\/p>\n<p>The exhibit, which was peer reviewed and had been previously approved by the NPS, documented the lives of enslaved people at the President\u2019s House. Its removal narrows public understanding of the nation\u2019s founding and obscures the history of slavery in the early United States.<\/p>\n<p>Our brief situates the exhibit\u2019s removal within broader federal actions following Executive Order No. 14253, which directed the Department of the Interior to remove certain interpretive content from sites under its jurisdiction. In response, the National Park Service has removed or altered interpretive materials at multiple locations, including those addressing African American, Indigenous, gender, and environmental history.<\/p>\n<p>These removals not only distort American history, but also go against the Park Service\u2019s avowed mission of sharing \u201caccurate and comprehensive history\u201d that includes \u201cthe good, the bad, [and] the ugly.\u201d Perhaps most troublingly, the erasure of history poses a threat to democracy itself. For democracy to thrive, a country\u2019s people must be freely able to examine and learn from their nation\u2019s full, unvarnished past.<\/p>\n<p>The brief was filed by Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) and Ballard Spahr LLP on behalf of the AHA.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The American Historical Association has filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the City of Philadelphia\u2019s lawsuit challenging the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":70648,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"aha-topic":[],"month":[555],"geographic-taxonomy":[],"post-type":[10,593,897,590,591],"thematic-taxonomy":[],"year":[901],"class_list":{"0":"post-119279","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","6":"hentry","7":"month-april","8":"post-type-advocacy","9":"post-type-amicus-briefs","10":"post-type-federal-government","11":"post-type-monuments","12":"post-type-museums","13":"year-901","20":"year-2026","21":"has-featured-image"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119279"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119279\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":119288,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119279\/revisions\/119288"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"aha-topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/aha-topic?post=119279"},{"taxonomy":"month","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/month?post=119279"},{"taxonomy":"geographic-taxonomy","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/geographic-taxonomy?post=119279"},{"taxonomy":"post-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-type?post=119279"},{"taxonomy":"thematic-taxonomy","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematic-taxonomy?post=119279"},{"taxonomy":"year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.historians.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/year?post=119279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}